Water Litigation Winding Down

The Tribune reports that the Santa Maria water litigation is winding down, and that the judge could issue a tentative ruling within the next month. Once that ruling is out, I will post it in its entirety on this blog, and attempt to give some sense to its holding and reasoning. It will be very interesting to see how the judge has viewed, evaluated and interpreted the evidence, as will be reflected in his tentative and final rulings. Stay tuned:

A judge heard closing arguments Friday in an eight-year-old lawsuit over water rights in the South County.

At least a tentative ruling should come within a month, said Henry Weinstock, who has represented Arroyo Grande, Grover Beach, Oceano and Pismo Beach in the lawsuit.

About 70 landowners most from the Santa Maria Valley and a few from southern San Luis Obispo County – chose to go to trial.

An estimated 1,000 other parties in the lawsuit including landowners and several cities and agencies that distribute water to customers signed a settlement.

The judge is expected in June to decide whether the remaining landowners should sign the existing settlement.

If his ruling matches the settlement terms, he could force the remaining landowners to sign it.

The landowners who elected to go to trial rather than settle as did the vast majority of the parties to this litigation have a great deal at stake in the final outcome. There could be some intense disappointment in the final result. After spending nearly 20 years as a litigator, it is the rare court case that is resolved through the final litigation process where all parties are pleased with the final ruling. Time will tell.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Water Litigation Winding Down

  1. As a litigator for over 25 years (wow,can it be that long? ;)–litigation comes with high risks, expense, angst and less control of the outcome. As one of the lawyers who participated in the case and settlement negotiations, in my opinion, the settlement was well thought out and produces a positive and certain outcome for the landowners.

  2. Jacqui, I would tend to agree with your assessment of litigation risks, and expense. Those who settle cases do so while they have control over the process. Those who continue on the litigation trail essentially roll the dice and hope for the good result. I also agree the settlement was a good resolution for those who signed on to it. I’m not sure the landowners to pressed on to trial, will necessarily be as happy with their result as those parties who elected to settle out while they still had some control. Thanks for stopping by and for your comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s